2019 Conference Presentations

No comments

Thank you for taking an interest in my research.  This post will feature my 2019 conference and workshop presentations.  It looks like 2019 is shaping up to be a busy year for conferences.

2019 Midwestern Political Science Association (MPSA) Conference  (Accepted November 2018)
(Chicago, Illinois, USA)

Title:  Turning a Blind Eye:  How Ideology Influences Perceptions of Sexual Harassment
Authors:  Clarisse Warren and Stephen Schneider

Abstract:   As a response to the election of Donald Trump to the American Presidency, the Women’s March on Washington in January 2017 was the earthquake that generated the tsunami of the #MeToo movement. The wave of allegations of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and abuse continues to wash across Hollywood, Washington D.C., and the American political and social landscape. Allegations of sexual misconduct have swept the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of federal and state governments. The unprecedented rate of allegations of sexual harassment and assault propelled the issue of sexual harassment onto the national stage and served as a divisive talking point among the mass public. The ways in which allegations of sexual harassment and assault were discussed at both the elite and mass electorate level seemed to fall along existing ideological cleavages. We examine the degree to which ideology is associated with perceptions of sexual harassment. Using two studies, we find that conservatives are less likely to perceive instances of sexual harassment, while liberals are more likely to perceive instances of sexual harassment, even when examining ambiguous situations. These findings have have implications on policy as well as electoral outcomes for those accused of sexual harassment.

Title:  Genetic Attributions of Gender Stereotypes Vary by Ideology: A Case for Using Genetic Attributions as Motivated Reasoning
Authors:  Stephen Schneider and Clarisse Warren

Abstract:  At the height of the #MeToo movement, a spotlight was placed on sexism in America and women’s status in society was called into question. Often, the status of women and other minority groups falls along ideological cleavages, wherein liberals are often seen as advancing minority rights while conservatives uphold the status quo. In this study we examine the role of ideology in how individuals perceive that men and women are different in some fundamental way. The endorsement of gender stereotypes and the causal attributions made based upon these stereotypes provides a unique window through which sexism can be examined. In this study we find that conservatives are more likely than liberals to say that gender differences exist on a number of stereotypical traits. Overall, conservatives are more likely to endorse genetic explanations for differences between men and women. These attributions align with existing political and social narratives surrounding the role of women in the home and society. Finally, we find that hostile sexism mediates the relationship between ideology and genetic attributions. It is likely that attributing gender differences to genetic factors is a mechanism used to bolster ones’ preexisting political narrative

Title:  The Psychophysiology of Negative Partisanship
Authors:  Stephen Schneider, Clarisse Warren, Ernest Dupree, Kevin B. Smith, and John R. Hibbing

Abstract:  Negative partisanship, the idea that partisanship can be anchored in intense dislike of an opposing party rather than a strong commitment to the party actually supported, has been offered as one explanation for increasing political polarization. We seek to investigate the basis of negative partisanship by hypothesizing this is a trait based in implicit, emotional responses to ideological outgroup stimuli. To do this we examine how individuals physiologically respond to a series of videos that alternate between attacking their partisan in-group and attacking their partisan out-group. We hypothesize that individuals with stronger implicit emotional responses (as measured by electro-dermal activity) to negative partisan appeals embedded in these videos are more likely to, (a) self-report a higher dislike of out-group compared to in-group partisan support, and (b) are more likely to support the use of political violence to achieve in-group partisan goals.


2019 
 Politics, Physiology, and Cognition : Advances in Theory and Method (Workshop)
(Montreal, Quebec, Canada)

Title:  I’m So Mad, I Could Spit!:  Analyzing Salivary Cortisol and Alpha-Amylase Responses to Partisan Media Messages
Authors:  Clarisse Warren, Stephen Schneider, Kevin B. Smith, and John R. Hibbing

Abstract:  With no shortage of virulence from both Republican and Democratic news sources, we examine the degree to which highly-charged, partisan media messages impact citizens’ physical and psychological stress levels.  This study examines citizens’ physiological and neuroendocrine stress responses to attitudinal and counterattitudinal televised media messages.  Employing traditional physiological measures of sympathetic nervous system response (skin conductance) we extend current research to include salivary bioscientific measures of the full human stress response.  The salivary biomarker alpha-amylase provides a neuroendocrine measure of sympathetic nervouse system activity and the salivary biomarker cortisol provides a measure of HPA-axis activity.  We discuss the future directions for salivary bioscientific measures of political stress.   Finally, we present the possibility that the stress response may be driving an individual’s desire to self-select attitudinal media messages (confirmation bias) and stay comfortably within his or her own echo chamber.

Title:  The Psychophysiology of Negative Partisanship
Authors:  Stephen Schneider, Clarisse Warren, Ernest Dupree, Kevin B. Smith, and John R. Hibbing

Abstract:  Negative partisanship, the idea that partisanship can be anchored in intense dislike of an opposing party rather than a strong commitment to the party actually supported, has been offered as one explanation for increasing political polarization. We seek to investigate the basis of negative partisanship by hypothesizing this is a trait based in implicit, emotional responses to ideological outgroup stimuli. To do this we examine how individuals physiologically respond to a series of videos that alternate between attacking their partisan in-group and attacking their partisan out-group. We hypothesize that individuals with stronger implicit emotional responses (as measured by electro-dermal activity) to negative partisan appeals embedded in these videos are more likely to, (a) self-report a higher dislike of out-group compared to in-group partisan support, and (b) are more likely to support the use of political violence to achieve in-group partisan goals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.